首页> 外文OA文献 >Getting Away with Foul Play?:The Importance of Formal and Informal Oversight Institutions for Electoral Integrity
【2h】

Getting Away with Foul Play?:The Importance of Formal and Informal Oversight Institutions for Electoral Integrity

机译:逃脱犯规行为?:选举诚信的正式和非正式监督机构的重要性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electoral integrity is increasingly being recognized as an important component of democracy, yet scholars still have limited understanding of the circumstances under which elections are most likely to be free, fair and genuine. This paper posits that effective oversight institutions play a key role in scrutinizing the electoral process and holding those with an interest in the electoral outcome to account. The main insight of this paper is that deficiencies in formal electoral management can be effectively compensated for via one or more other institutional checks: an active and independent judiciary, an active and independent media and/or an active and independent civil society. Flawed elections are most likely to take place when all four checks on electoral conduct fail in key ways. These hypotheses are tested and supported on a cross-national time-series dataset of 1,047 national-level elections held in 156 electoral regimes between 1990 and 2012.
机译:选举廉正越来越被认为是民主的重要组成部分,但学者们对选举最有可能是自由,公正和真诚的情况的了解仍然有限。本文认为,有效的监督机构在审查选举过程并使对选举结果感兴趣的机构中担当重要角色。本文的主要见解是,可以通过一项或多项其他机构检查来有效地弥补正式选举管理中的缺陷:积极独立的司法机构,积极独立的媒体和/或积极独立的公民社会。当对选举行为的所有四项检查均未能通过关键途径时,最有可能发生有缺陷的选举。在1990年至2012年期间,在156个选举制度中举行的1,047个国家级选举的跨国时间序列数据集中,对这些假设进行了检验和支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号